Volunteer Management: Grievance and Complaints

Dear committee,I do not wish to continue thefor them, so it'll work for us'.Grievance and
proscribed process as outlined in the action pointscomplaints, like the burden of any bureaucracy,
of the last committee meeting regarding mycould quickly start to over-formalise volunteering
grievance with Meg. It seems obvious that withthus dampening personal creativity. This
Meg's abject refusal to even attempt to redressadministrative approch is clearly not appropriate
the problem that any process will fail to effectfor every organisation. However, it is important to
change without putting the museum directly into atreat volunteers fairly and without procedures all
potentially destructive process.Please find theproblems will tend to be tackled on an ad hoc
attached document 'Complaints.rtf', which outlinesbasis which would inexorably result in unequal
the processes that are notionally in use, I musttreatment and will only ever heighten any pre
stress that this is a draft, and should not beexisting people's sense of injustice or could create
considered anything more than my personal notesit.It is now generally accepted that guidelines are
on the problem. Please circulate asrequired specifically for volunteers, if for no other
appropriate.Because there has not been areason than to avoid an over-formalisation of
coherent effort to document this, until now, what'contracts' or 'agreements' between the
has not been noticed is that this is a systemorganisation and its volunteers, which can lead to
which requires command and control structuresambiguities in the status of volunteers.There are
that don't, and can't, exist within a totallymany examples of volunteers clamming
voluntary organisation. This power vacuum is aprotection under employment law, and there is a
natural consequence of the fact that, increasingly,general perception within committee levels that
we are all volunteers, thus among othervolunteers are never personally at fault for any
inconsistencies, the required level of perceiveddamage caused to the organisation, ie any
authority to execute this style of system whereproblem is in some way seen as a result of the
one volunteer has to exert speculative controlfault of management instead of the 'guilty party'.
over others does not exist. This can be seen inThis is true of paid employment, as a direct result
the question of ' which hat am I wairing' and theof employment law but this can not be applied to
confusion generated where direct reporting andthe voluntary sector for reasons that should be
operational lines are combined into one personobvious later.In the event of a complaint by or
with two 'hats'.To extend the argument, I thinkconcerning a volunteer, all involved should always
since a hierarchical system is failing to manageknow there is someone - usually a Manager - who
with grievance and complaints, the idea of a moreis beyond the direct reporting lines of any issue,
communal arrangement is worth somewith whom they can discuss matters of concern.
consideration, ie there have been two complaintsIn most circumstances, this manager will be able
recently, incidentally both of which can be directlyto resolve problems, by listening to the
linked to Meg's interference.In this communalvolunteer(s) concerned. All parties must know
environment, if a complaint can not be resolvedwho is responsible and that matters in this
informally, it passes to a 'committee of the wholecontext will be treated confidentially.Dealing with
house' type meeting for all volunteers andComplaints:If complaints cannot be resolved by
management to ask the questions of alldiscussion, then some suitable framework has be
concerned and to vote on a consensual solution.Asput in place to deal with such situations; the
a by product of this thinking, I would seriouslyoverall affect should be to create a buffer
recommend that management committeebetween the personal and private area of
meetings be opened up to all volunteers, and theinvolvement. This process should be seen as a
formal directors meetings reduced to thelast resort, to be implemented only if supervision
circulation of written reports, effectively revertingand support have failed to resolve the
to a more passive entity, ie as things weresituations.As with other areas of volunteer
before committee members were actively gettingmanagement, present guidelines recommend that
involved in operations.I don't want to teach peopleeach organisation should formulate their own
how to suck eggs, but my situation doesn't givecomplaints process surrounding volunteer
me much choice in the matter as I have a uniqueinvolvement. A framework for dealing with
insight into the workings of the museum, and Icomplaints should include methods whereby there
would hate to think that this painful episode hasis:1) A named person for dealing with complaints;2)
not produced anything of benefit to anyone.WithA clear policy known to all everyone;3) Separation
kind regards,----------Dear committee,It has been 3and boundaries of confidentiality;4) A method to
weeks since the last committee meeting at which,withdraw complaints at any time;5) A process for
as I understand the situation, Meg was 'asked' tocomplaints included in the induction process;6)
informally make some 'attempt' at 'resolving' theVolunteers have the right to appeal.Complaints by
'personal' 'issues' between her and I. Please excuseVolunteers:As already stated, minor matters can
the excessive use of quotation marks above, mybe prevented from becoming major issues
feelings as to the failures of the past should bethrough good lines of communication, supervision
obvious - that is not important as we look to theand support. If a matter cannot be resolved
future, continuing in the same way. Nothingthrough informal discussions, keeping guidelines as
happened, or even looks like progress, I don'tstraightforward as possible can help ease
know what to do now, was hoping for somefrustration. Long, drawn out and complicated
advice at the opening.Well, I've gone out of myprocesses could be seen as a deliberate form of
way to give Meg reasonable opportunities in whichintimidation to prevent issues being reported in the
to start what ever process was indicated,first place and to prevent matters being dealt
including fixing her computer which hadwith swiftly / justly. Building on the framework
malfunctioned the day before the meeting, (heatdescribed above, if volunteers wish to make a
retention damage to her most recent files) in factcomplaint, there needs to be:1) An explanation of
while leaving, that same meeting, she asked mythe options available in order to make a
dad if he thought I would help her sort it out.Icomplaint;2) A procedure for putting complaints in
sorted out the computer, said that if she had onlywriting;3) An acknowledgement that making a
being using MsWord, instead of Wordpad, shecomplaint against another volunteer will not
would not have lost her priory exhibition texts,prejudice their opportunity to continue to
I've even offered to help her learn how to use allvolunteer for the organisation.4) Documentation of
the features of Word while helping to write herthe complaint and subsequent meeting/s to
'reporting responsibilities' document, that wouldresolve the problem and the outcome should be
have directly resolved' the root of the originalkept on record.5) The right to withdraw from
conflict.The fact is that she only even talks to metheir involvement with the organisation or be
when its convenient for her, ie when she needsgiven extra support to continue, whilst the
something, before her computer issue I don'tcomplaint is being dealt with.If the complaint is of
think she has said more than 3 consecutive wordsa serious nature, it may require the involvement
to me since last October.Even at the opening,of a manager, or chair of the management
there were times when Meg just came over andcommittee.In situations where a volunteer makes
started talking to whom ever was there, as if Ia complaint, he/she should be informed of the
didn't exist, once while talking she moved fromoutcome.Complaints against Volunteers:In most
where she was standing so as to literally excludecircumstances, concerns about a volunteer's
me too.Anyway, I believe Meg is not ignoring orconduct should be dealt with in supervisory
just not trying but is actively not accepting anymeetings, for example where someone starts
problem even existed, I can only assume she isinterfering with other people's work. The
having difficulty as an ex school teacher, butimportant point here is that dealing with a
that's no reason to hide her head in the sand.complaint at an early stage and in a more informal
What sort of behaviour is this for an adultway is more likely to result in a satisfactory
women? What sort of an example is this for theoutcome by monitoring and intervention before
younger generation?I think Meg wants all this topossible problems are realised is preferable to
be forgotten, putdown to bad luck and then all willsorting out problems after the event.In situations
be right again, either that or she 'believes' that shewhere a volunteer has seriously breached his/her
has resolved the problems, maybe since I fixedresponsibilities, he/she can be asked to leave the
her computer, it her mind, that counts somehow.organisation. However, these situations need to be
:-)Well indeed the memory and the emotion fadesspecified at the time of induction. They may
- but the understanding gained will not so easily,include, but not limited to, the following:1) Theft of
enlightenment itself does not - not completely.property;2) Act of violence;3) Falsifications of
What does this teach me? It teaches me that Irecords;4) Abuse/harassment;5) Vandalism
am who I was, and will always be, and so willdamage to property;6) Unauthorised disclosure of
Meg, she didn't even write her final dissertationconfidential information;7) Action or inaction putting
(she gave notes to her friend who organised andself or the public at riskFurther to this and
typed it up). Still I wonder about how it is that thisdepending on the nature of the complaint, the
terrible and terrifying thing called human societyvolunteer may be asked to withdraw his/her
allows the truly stupid, reckless and dangerous toservices on a temporary basis, while the matter
flourish.So then logically, if I am to survive in thisis being investigated. Before any action is
world, in the midst of this society, then I too canproposed to deal with a complaint, the complaint
just go around floundering helplessly interferingitself needs to be verified. The steps which may
with things I don't understand, aimlessly notbe taken to rectify a situation would include:1)
knowing or caring for the reason to do so;Nature of the complaint;2) Why the behaviour has
barking orders & acting unilaterally, just as long asoccurred;3) Implementing change (additional
I say what ever is politically convenient at thatsupport, training etc.) within a given time frame.4)
time so people think I'm actually competent!WithReview of change.If, no change or insufficient
kind regards,-------------------Dear committee,I seechange in attitude or behaviour is observed, in
your version of the covering note section on yourspite of additional support, it may well be
reasoning is 'stronger' than dads original.I like it, asnecessary to ask the volunteer to leave the
you imply that Meg/Sheila didn't know there wereorganisation if for no other reason then to enable
other considerations, other than simply a matterthe other volunteers to continue to contribute
of permission fromVestry Hall, and just becausewithout feeling duress and or to prevent a feeling
they didn't think it would be a problem, that nooneof 'unfairness' .Bearing in mind the concerns
else would have anything important to say on theexpressed above, questions have to be raised as
matter & it is not in anyone's interest for this toto how far it is possible for an organisation to
continue.The sad fact is that, there was debate attake action 'against' a volunteer, unlike in paid
' committee level ' (you may remember aemployment there is in fact very little action that
'committee' ad hoc meeting in our garden lastcan be taken other than removing the disruptive
year when I was present, let alone more formalinfluence. Due to this fact that nothing can be
ones where I was not) about the possibilities,done other than that quite extreme measure,
including that of a permanent sign, however theavoiding problems and minimising risks is
point that once we have permission to mountpreferable to trying to resolve problems after the
such a sign, there MUST be committeeevent.Throughout any process and during the
consultation has been (conveniently) lost.Indeed, attime a volunteer is with an organisation, it needs
that initial (informal) stage, the details ofto be made clear that their services can be
implementation weren't important enough towithdrawn, without redress, on either side, this is
warrant any real consideration which, sadly,why the issue of volunteer protection under
means that Meg/Sheila could argue that theyemployment law must be avoided at all costs, as
'didn't know they needed to know anything else'these two ideas are totally irreconcilableDeciding
thus due to their limited understanding, they feelon the best methods of dealing with complaints
no committee consultation was required.I don'trequires thought, preparation and review. The
think this works in practise, ignorance should notNAVB suggest that the involvement of volunteers
be a reasonable defence, assuming they generally(and other related members of staff) in the
didn't believe there would be any problems, shouldformulation in the methods to deal with complaints
volunters be able to act unilaterally?I think Megis often helpful. As the NAVB state, the positive
Sheila could argue that, 'You unilaterally put up theconsequences of this are two fold: Firstly, it raises
WVF signs without committee consultation, this isawareness of the process and secondly helps to
no different'.In the first instance these areensure that volunteers are happy with the
temporary signs, erected correctly, by a traineddecision about such issues that affect them
volunteer and not subject to the samedirectly, (NAVB, 1995, p.5). Due to the nature of
requirements. But more to the point, they wereunpaid work, it is important that those effected
erected as part of an overall strategy which wasare consulted and their input is valued and
agreed at committee level, where as the questionrecognised.As a direct result of an open structure,
of a perment Museum sign was not.The questionif a volunteer is asked to leave as a result of a
now, which Meg/Sheila could argue is about wherecomplaint being upheld and not being resolved, it
we draw the boundary between normalneeds to be done firmly but with fairness.Leaving
(day-to-day) operations which don't requirethe Organisation:Many organisations find volunteer
committee consultation and what things do?I thinkretention difficult and volunteers sometimes seem
anything that someone should reasonably suspectto leave all too frequently. Nevertheless, this
could effect the running/operation of the museumfreedom to come and go, without redress, is at
MUST be subject to committee consultation,the heart of the volunteering experience and a
except to the extent where preexisting generalodds with employment law. Some organisations
authority has been given - was this ever done formay feel that they require a specified
Meg and Sheila?If so how can they supportcommitment from their volunteers, however, this
justerfy someone who has responsibility for thecan prove problematic if in so doing it creates a
internal displays therefore having unilateralmore formal, legally binding agreement.At
authority for anything else. Whatever the case,whatever stage a volunteer wishes to leave, it is
everyone should be alert of such a policyWith kindessential that his/her input is valued and
regards,-----------Summary:This is an introductionrecognised. One way of doing this is to obtain and
to some relatively complex areas related tovalue their opinion on the work of the organisation
appraisals and evaluations which constitute twoand volunteer involvement. Current thinking that in
processes which can assist volunteerleaving volunteers are given the opportunity to
management.It is only in situations which godiscuss their work and reasons for leaving. Useful
drastically wrong that a complaints process needsquestions which may be to ask volunteers who
to come into operation. Most complaints, either bydecide to leave the include:1) What was your role?
or about volunteers, can usually be dealt with inDid this change over time? If yes, how?2) What
supervisory sessions or through discussions with adid you best like about volunteering with this
manager. Volunteers need to know who they canorganisation?3) What did you least like about
approach should they wish to make a complaintvolunteering with us?4) What improvements
and the action which will be taken is certainwould you make for changes or improvements in
guidelines and policies are broken by them.Makingthe organisation's involvement of volunteers?5)
such processes as fair and straightforward asWould you recommend other people to come and
possible is important, in unpaid work it becomes allvolunteer with this organisation?From gathering
to easy for seemingly minor issues to heightensuch information as a volunteer leaves, it is
any pre existing sense of injustice or to crate it apossible to build up a picture of volunteering within
feeling of there being an inner-circle of friends.the organisation and this information could prove
Many volunteers leave an organisation of theirinvaluable to the organisation as it may be used to
own accord. Volunteers need to be valued andcontribute to the future retention of other
supported through their time of leaving. In thisvolunteers.It may be found that several
way, volunteers will leave with a positivevolunteers leave for the same reason; this
experience of the organisation and possibly returninformation will allow the Volunteer Manager to
in the future and of invite others, should theimplement any changes considered necessary to
opportunity arise.Complaints:There may beaid future retention of volunteers.© Michael
occasions when a volunteer has cause to make aHart.I am the website administrator of the Wandle
complaint about another volunteer, organisationsindustrial museum ( Established in 1983 by local
run by volunteers where 'there's never been apeople to ensure that the history of the valley
problem' and have never had need of measureswas no longer neglected but enhanced awareness
for such procedures, sometimes import boilerplateits heritage for the use and benefits of the
grievance and disciplinary procedures from acommunity.
business environment on the basis that 'it works