Extension Education Reformation - I - New Reformation Models

SummaryExtension Education (Wani, 1992).
Technology akin to farming existing in anTraining & visits on farm level failed but
ecosystem need to be generated. It needsfarmer-training & Farmer-research participation or
location specific perfection and adoption. This coulddemonstrations at farmers field did achieve a
be possible by supporting KVK & Extensiongreat success. With constraints of men and
system with technology testing and refinement.resources and crop insurance in vogue, we must
Thus the whole discipline of Agricultural Extensioninduce researchers to have direct participatory
need reforms. On the basis of a broad reviewresearch at farmer's doors, on their fields. This
presented in this paper, followingventure can be on cost-sharing basis or with
recommendations could be deduced to reformparticipatory involvement of Industry. (SAMETI,
and fine tune technology generation, disseminationKashmir model refers). Proc. XXI EECM,2008.
and its delivery as an agri-pack endNew Approaches
product.(APEP)Insect-pest Management research could be an
1. The base of discipline of Agriculture extensionexample. Some FAO programme results are
may be broaded to incorporate all disciplines,encouraging (Matteson, 2000). Rice IPM research
management tools and techniques. It is proposedmust incorporate farmer-training of farmers. New
to name it "Farm Business Management". It shouldpest management procedures are to be
be open to all agricultural & allied undergraduates.experimented under farmers field. Minimum use of
The course curriculum needs training and skillpesticide and eco-friendly application is preferred.
up-gradation of graduates and post-graduates in(Matteson, 2000).
techniques like analysis of data, surveyProblems and constraints of technology transfer in
procedures, marketing, economics, rural sociologyIndia have been reported, (Bairathi, 1998). Similarly
and farming systems etc.bio-gas technology use or adoption has been full
2. Various reformation capsules like Chineseof constraints detailed . (Prasad and Singh, 1999),
model, African experiences, Dutch model,these range from technological, financial,
Netherland model, Isreal model, California modeladministrative and innovative ones. Proper
and Iranian models have been reviewed. On themechanization and training in operation of such bio
basis of these models a new model forgas technology is necessary.
technology delivery suitable to ourAn information web networking developed helped
agro-eco-conditions has been postulated & namedfarmers to improve their income through training
as Mohi-Model. Once we receive an acceptanceand advise thus participatory technology transfer
for the model, logistics and plans to execute itis a possible mechanism for improvement in
could be formulated.Agri-productivity. (Warren, 2003)
IntroductionNetherlands Model
Four paradigms of Agricultural extension consistsQuest for knowledge led Netherland farmers to
of Technology transfer, prevalent since colonialhave an association for organic farm produce. This
times & later National Agriculture Extensionassociation conducted its own farm research and
Project (NAEP), reshaped in 1970-80 as Trainingshared its experiences with other farmer
and visit system across Asia. It involved topmembers back in 1980. Soon they felt that their
down approach. Its role needs disdcussion. Theexperiences lacked experimental details. They
second paradigm called as Advisory work is whatapproached Govt agricultural Research
is present system of extension, where,Organization and started collaborating with them.
government agencies, NGO and technicalThe station mandate was to assist the
industries respond to farmers enquiries which wedevelopment of farming systems in the area
call advisory role. The third paradigm consists ofcalled polder in the village Nagale of Netherland.
Human Resource Development. This innovationThis combination of research and farming
helped Europe and North America. The Universitiespractices at farmers field tried various crop
gave training to rural youth. It is these educated,combinations and rotations. The use of
trained youth which became future farmers innitrogen-fixing crops (Legumes) for maintaining soil
developed countries. What is known as outreachfertility and strategic management of pests and
system of colleges and universities is still unknowndiseases, extending or delaying planting of various
in our Agricultural Research system including Statecrops etc. Some experiences of low-weed-crop
Agriculture Universities. A half hearted attempt asproduction by adopting agronomic practices like
Agri-business Agri-clinical is still to be backed withregular harrowing of lands and use of crop covers
University, research, banking and economicwere tried. The farmer pressure and self
support. Is it which can help us to increasesustaining groups need to be involved in research
productivity in India or Asia needs consideration ?.experiments of SAU/ICAR and all other KVK
Technology adoption and impactfarms and institutes (Reinders, 2007). This would
The impact of National Agricultural Researchhave both a demonstration and high adoption
Project (NARP) (1986-92) revealed that ,value. Besides it would be a close to practical field
technologies generated were few and adoptionresearch model (PFRM).
rate was not high, even then an estimatedHorizontal, farmer to farmer contacts help
monetary benefit of Rs.2000/ per hectare wasdissemination of agricultural information. This
observed.horizontal expansion of information from one
Low relationship between technologies developedvegetable grower to another in Suden. (Badri,
and adopted demands a mixed farming2001) helped technology adoption.
technology capsule as 65% of our farmer's areMass media support for rice production has been
small and marginal farmers. This needs a totalhelpful in Bihar. Out of 5 TV talks, 75% farmers
shift to left in our agricultural extensionbenefited and registered higher production and low
methodology. (Reddy 2001).disease damages. (1taque, 2000) similar
T & V programme initiated with central assistanceobservations are known in J&K. (Wani 2006).
in state has aroused all round technologicalElectronic technological diffusion of knowledge at
awareness among agricultural experts. Its dialogueFarmer's fields was helpful, local language and local
and technology transfer from Universitypersons can diffuse ideas and disseminate
(Scientists) to experts agricultural extensioninformation and communication faster. It is
workers was nearly total revolution. The (ZAREC)proposed to have innovative knowledge defusion
Zonal Agricultural advisory Research and Extensionto women farmers through local women (Rani
counseling was the best plate form to discussand Reddy, 2002).
main issues impeding agricultural development. TheFarm - Women awareness Module
missionary publication of productionMajority of rice producing farmers in Kangra
recommendations helps a lot in transfer ofdistrict of Himachal Pradesh had no extension
technology. The presentation of productionpersonnel contact or electronic or print media
recommendations in local language is helpful ininformation. Continuous information on mass
increasing productivity in many countries. (Wani,media have significant impact on use of seed rate,
2004)transplantation time and application of nitrogenous
Brinjal production technology adoption in Parbani,fertilizers in Rice (Thusoo and Sohi, 2000). A gap
Mahrastra was the result of social participation,existed in knowledge of farmers so far as dose
risk management guarantee, marketingof fertilizer application is concerned (Yadav and
orientation, information websites andSingh, 2000).
communication methods. (Dudhak et al 2003).Farm women adoption rate for use of farm
Various limitation of transport, extension staffimplements was good when uses of such
were the reasons of poor productivity gains inimplements were demonstrated to them. (Sharma
Malakhand agency of Pakistan. (Mohamad et al,et al 2003).
2003).Farm women were given farm implements to use
The adoption of legume production technologiesfor a fortnight. Majority found them 78%
under Jhodpur arid conditions was low. Theprofitable & 77% compatible. (Sharma and
problems as indicated by farmers were smallSharma, 2002). Information from research to
farm size. Small holder farmer was less interestedfarmers via extension officers was examined.
to adopt these technologies. Non existence ofThe inter system communication helps in
market and pricing policy, risk of failure, feedingtechnology dissemination of dairy farmers in Iran
habits, social taboo and lack of Post Harvest(Rezvanfer, 2001). Rice cultivation awareness
Technology (PHT) were identified. (Yadev et al,improved when women farmers were trained
2003).(Rama Krishnan and Mahendram, 2003).
Proper guidance or information support was theAgricultural Knowledge and information system
major constraint in adoption of improved Wheatincreased economic efficiency of crop production,
cultivation in Himachal Pradesh. It contributed toout put costs, social upgradation and income
16.8% non-adoption rate among farmers. Othergeneration (Carrasco et al, 2003).
contributory factors were technologicalExtension Briefs - self help options (SHO)
unawareness (13.33%) sloppy land (11.31%), farmSmall farmers are neglected by extension
input cost (9.41%), non availability of irrigationservices and need proper awareness in Kurram
(8.29%) and lack of inputs (7.95%) (Puran chand(Haq et al 2004). Agricultural extension specialists
et al, 2001).must specialize in community structure,
Social Structure & Technology Adoptiondevelopment , education learning tools, technology
Schedule caste farmers in Maharastra have lowand policy issues. Thus these disciplines or topics
level of rice technology adoption. Among 150 suchneed incorporation in Farm Business Management
farmers only 12.6% had high adoption ratecurriculum.
(Mankar et al,2004). Adoption of productionPartnership process, management and
recommendations of Cashew in Maharastra'scommunication should be the main thrust.
Sindhubrug district was 58% (Bhairamkar et al,Co-operative mechanism, farm business
2004). Motto of extension programmes should bemanagement and evaluation and monitoring tools
reach to unreached, teach to un-teached, beshould be used.
known to unknown (Ganesan et al, 2003) (Wani,Seed production programme was successfully
1998). Agricultural productivity in Czch Republicimplemented by farm women as a self-help group
increased when information and communication inin Dindigul district of Tamil Nadu (Balasubramanian
extension system was improved for small scaleand Thamizoli, 2003). Efficiency of extension lies in
farmers (Slavik, 2003).bottom up approach in hilly areas. Farmers
A survey conducted among 120 farmers ininterest group awareness was most successful
Karnool district, Andhra Pradesh, India, revealed(Muhammad-Zafarullah 2003). Small scale farming
that education, social participation, scientificoperations using green manure cover improved
orientation, risk management, mass mediasoil fertility. Participatory extension system helped
exposure, economic and market orientation weremore adoption of technology in Uganda. (Miiro et
positively and significantly correlated with theal, 2002).
extent of adoption of recommended hybrid jowarFarmers training and their own information
(sorghum) seed practices by the farmers.networks helps small holder farmers. Topics
Majority of the farmers (43.33%) had a mediumincluding community involvement, international
level of the adoption of the recommendedmulticultural projects, leadership, learning
practices. (Kumar et al, 2005). It is suggested thatstrategies, new tools and technology, volunteer
five categories of factors determine the adoptionprogramme , programme development and
of irrigation systems and are the keys toevaluation, public policy issues, youth education and
designing relevant, effective and innovativepartnerships needs introduction in Agri-Extension
irrigation extension programmes amongcurricula (now proposed as Farm Business
horticulturalists. The five categories of factors areManagement). Agriculture, natural resources and
: Soil type and topography ; crop quality; sowinghealth/nutrition shall form the basic of new
time; saving water and crop yield (Kaine &agri-farm-business extension system (Logan,
Beswell, 2005). We in J&K under SREP Strategic2004). The word extension be replaced with
Research extension plan of Districts notice lack of"Farm Business Management".
information on sowing time, seed rate andAdministrative Bottlenecks
fertilizer application in almost all the crops. SeedWhile the Nusa Tenggara Timur Provience is
treatment awareness helped farmers to combatsupposedly following the training and visit model,
paddy blast (Wani, 2006, 2007).agricultural extension Workers receive very little
Innovative Changetraining. Other major constraints identified include
Methodologies for analysis of farming system,constant restructuring of the Agricultural
options for development & sustainableDepartment, poor remuneration, oppressive
eco-friendly farm science technology are theauthority, inadequate infrastructure, unclear job
needs of the hour. We do havedirection, geographical conditions and bureaucracy.
subject-matter-specialists, but the agents for(Leta et al, 2005). This is the reason of low
evaluating the composite effect of varioustechnology revolution in rural India and Asia too
discipline oriented technology cover is yet to becan be overcomed by transparent, NAR System,
structured. This is exactly where we shouldwhich need renaming as National Farm utility
intervene and restructure the discipline,Research and delivery system.
programmes and divisions of extension educationBy combining biophysical science with social
in the country. Infact a total change from existingscience, it is possible to increase the impact of
slow action, low innovative, conventional andbiophysical science findings at the farm level
disintegrated extension system has to be refined(Linehan et al, 2005).
into analytic , managemental , social, economical,Isreal Model
marketable system, so that the whole technologyGeneral model of extension in SAU can be seen
transfer could be evaluated in terms offrom the role of PAU, which needs a total reform.
productivity and monetory gains per hectare.Should we look for Isreal model. Isreal is
Different cropping and livestock patterns andcharacterized by topographical variations and a
combinations need to be evaluated & monitored.wide range of soils, enabling the growing and
The impact analysis of wide range of Agriculturalraising of a variety of crops and animals. A large
technology transfer be it training, entrepreneurshipincrease in population immediately after 1948,
or agri business is needed, both before and afterrequired a rapid increase in food production,
technology application.followed by development of research and
The available research results have to pierce theextension facilities and services. In recent years
farmers farming practices. Non - adoption is theIsreal, like many other countries, has faced
result of our low productivity levels per unit ofdifficulties in continuing to supply the level of
land. Inspite of tremendous yield gains the per unitservices it previously provided. This difficulty led
profitability has not raised the economic conditionsagricultural organizations to begin assuming the
of our farmers. Our farm economy still fluctuatesresponsibility of partially financing extension for a
between season's, rainy years and among regions.few years, and later on trying to reflect the cost
Now for any widespread gains from technology, itonto the farmers. Farmers are apparently willing
is essential to know its impact and adoptabilityto pay for on-farm extension visits. Under this
rate. It is therefore necessary to develop newsystem, the Flower Board is financing many public
technologies after considering socio-organizationalextension activities and charging the farmer for
arrangements, local existing soil, water, humanpartial costs of on-farm visits. This system
needs and resources. The local skills need to beoperates successfully, aided by reports that are
known and refinement is made to improvefiled electronically by agents all over Isreal to the
profitability. Our experience under IVLP showed aFloriculture Department Head Office, and from the
net productivity gains of 2 q/hac in rice productionHead Office to the Flower Board. Advantages of
by improving local village driven plough. Similarthe new system are : a tremendous increase in
innovative ideas local technologies with improvedagent-to-farmer commitment; the professional
or exotic one gave good results in developmentlevel of agents remains at least the same as
of profitable farming . (Wani, 2004,2003,before; and the financial situation of the majority
2005,2006,2007).of agents is better than before . The
Reform Capsulesdisadvantage is that some farmers are consuming
(i) Chinese Modelless extension than before. (Wolpson, 2005)
Chinese experiences needs a try under ourGlobal Successful extension experiences
socio-economic conditions. The successfulCalifornia Model
improvement of Sheep and Yak herds in chinaCalifornia's land grant extension progamme has
can be a good example for use in India. Under thisbeen successful in assisting agricultural Industries
project they first took stock of rangeland anddevelop as major world producers. Extension has
livestock resources. Then socio-economicbeen a leader in facilitating quality-of-life and
conditions of the livestock breeders wereeconomic improvements for rural communities
analysed. Livestock and pasture management bythroughout the state. However, population
rodents was studied. Rasngeland revegatationexplosion has transformed California into an urban
methods were tested and propagated. Seededstate, with changing societal issues, values and
fodders and effect of these improved method ofpriorities. Agricultural extension programmes
pasture development on disease control andcontinue to directly serve a declining number of
profits from livestock were analysed. (Wageninclientale that represent less than 1.5% of the
gem et al, 2001). Thus, the extension educationpopulation. Financial support for extension is
programmes should ensure facilitation of Farmerdecreasing at the country and state levels, thus
empowerment and not dependence on subsidy.such models used by us in SAU could be
This means incorporating studies and programmescatastrophic and need change.
of Agri-livestock economics, grass land andIranian Model
rangeland management, crop and tree productionIran is one of the world's top ten horticultural
in Agri-extension curricula.producers. However, post-harvest losses in Iran
(ii) African Modelare six times greater than the world average.
A new participating approach of clubbing local andEven after establishing an agricultural extension
outside knowledge to solve the agriculturalService, Iran still experiences great problems in
problem is needed. Innovative approaches for soilreducing post-harvest losses (Jowkar, 2005).
and water conservation in Ethiopia and TanzaniaResults revealed that education, material
were helpful. A new model of participatorypossession, mass media exposure, extension
modified Technology development approach iscontact, scientific orientation and risk preference
fast being recognized, as the only way of clubbingwere significantly and positively correlated with
traditional and modern technologies forthe knowledge level of farmers pre- and post
agri-development . (Kib Wana et al 2000)training. (Malite et al , 2005.
(iii) Dutch ModelIssues
The total reformation of agricultural technologyAgricultural development programmes often
transfer shall need refinement of elementaryproduce unexpected results. This can be
methodologies used in extension consisting ofattributed to the fact that the target farmers
PRA, PERT or other specific managemental,already have their own knowledge and
communication and modern GIS- Geographiccompetencies that determine their practices. In
Information System use. This would involve aorder to be adopted, an innovation has first to be
total change in Extension Education, objectives,discussed, and then appropriated by a local group
methodology & course curriculum. We needof farmers in their system of knowledge and in
agricultural networking for bringing out results oftheir system of meaning; subsequently the
transferable technologies. Experimental learninginnovation may be rejected or adopted by all the
and knowledge sharing has to be incorporated, asfarmers concerned (Mathieu, 2004).
research on farmers field. Farmers have to beProblems
part of our learning and experimentation process.The findings also revealed that the attitudes of
Dutch model could be used. (Leeuwis, 2000) inthe respondents were significantly and positively
India to ensure quick technology use. Let usrelated to education, organizational membership,
evaluate technology use. It has been seen thatland holding, contact with extension agent , mass
some progressive farmers have awareness ofmedia exposure, socio-economic status,
technology but being absentee farmers, theirawareness, income and material possession. Lack
workers have no knowledge or skills to use themof proper technical knowledge, lack of irrigation
in the field. Is it time to come out of "Technologyfacility and high cost of fertilizers/chemical were
dissemination Scenario" to "Technology Use Statusindicated as the three most important problems
in the field" and "Productivity gain assessmentof the tribal farm women run agriculture farms.
models" .(Bharali et al, 2004).
(iv) Mohi - Model - (Proposed Model)New Vistas
Experience learning, market designs, farmAgricultural extension is evolving world wide, and
economics, sustainable agriculture, Agri-information,there is much emphasis today on
communication skills and farm business shall becommunity-based mechanisms of dissemination in
the knowledge bank available to Agri-Extension &order to bring sustainable change. The factors
communication experts, whom we should namethat make farmer groups successful in
"FBM" - "Farm Business Management Experts".disseminating information and technologies need to
The Extension Education is outdated and toobe analyzed. A mixed methodology, multiple-stage
oftenly used and misunderstood phrase. Extensionapproach was used to obtain data. Dairy-goat
includes now every attempt to communicate withfarmer groups (n=46) and individual farmers
farmers. Today's extension agencies can be(n=88) were interviewed. Factors that were
university scientists, Subject matter specialists,associated with group success in dissemination
Agri experts, farmers or even partially Agriincluded member participation, degree of jealousy
known NGO or their agents. Thus, the wholewithin the group, homogeneity of members, group
blame of others has to be shared by Universitycapacity, number of linkages and type of group
experts. Agri-University, applied knowledge has to(Project-supported versus non-supported). Some
be communicated to farmers as "end product" asinterventions that may increase the success of
pharmaceutical companies do. Thus all the currentgroups in dissemination include capacity- building ,
"building block" , known knowledge has to beincreasing linkages with other extension
computerized and stored. This has to be reshapedstakeholders, providing an environment for groups
and re-arranged as knowledge packs forto form, using established groups (as compared
innovative and whole farming capsules rather thanto forming new groups), and encouraging groups
one commodity knowledge sharing as in the west.to form around common interests rather than for
We do have commodity but not compositeother reasons. (Davis et al, 2004). Some methods
agriculture packages. A booklet on its compositein this direction are documented (Wani,2008 a).
effects has been published as Broad Based